<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old vs New: Great Logo Redesigns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theroxor.com/2009/03/26/old-vs-new-great-logo-redesigns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theroxor.com/2009/03/26/old-vs-new-great-logo-redesigns/</link>
	<description>Because Design Rocks!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Errante</title>
		<link>http://theroxor.com/2009/03/26/old-vs-new-great-logo-redesigns/comment-page-1/#comment-20459</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Errante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theroxor.com/?p=1215#comment-20459</guid>
		<description>Most of these are huge improvements. I still don&#039;t get the walmart asterisk thing. Are those supposed to be corn kernels? What does the symbol mean? Does it have any significance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of these are huge improvements. I still don&#8217;t get the walmart asterisk thing. Are those supposed to be corn kernels? What does the symbol mean? Does it have any significance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Famous Redesigned Logos of 2009 – A huge roundup!! &#124; Logo Design Blog</title>
		<link>http://theroxor.com/2009/03/26/old-vs-new-great-logo-redesigns/comment-page-1/#comment-19386</link>
		<dc:creator>Famous Redesigned Logos of 2009 – A huge roundup!! &#124; Logo Design Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theroxor.com/?p=1215#comment-19386</guid>
		<description>[...] http://theroxor.com/2009/03/26/old-vs-new-great-logo-redesigns/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://theroxor.com/2009/03/26/old-vs-new-great-logo-redesigns/" rel="nofollow">http://theroxor.com/2009/03/26/old-vs-new-great-logo-redesigns/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creative Web Design</title>
		<link>http://theroxor.com/2009/03/26/old-vs-new-great-logo-redesigns/comment-page-1/#comment-14323</link>
		<dc:creator>Creative Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 02:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theroxor.com/?p=1215#comment-14323</guid>
		<description>Definitely a nice list. BP&#039;s was drastic, and also helped them with their new &quot;Beyond Petroleum&quot; branding, despite petroleum being their main product. The Science Channel and Taca are also tastefully improved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely a nice list. BP&#8217;s was drastic, and also helped them with their new &#8220;Beyond Petroleum&#8221; branding, despite petroleum being their main product. The Science Channel and Taca are also tastefully improved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://theroxor.com/2009/03/26/old-vs-new-great-logo-redesigns/comment-page-1/#comment-13367</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theroxor.com/?p=1215#comment-13367</guid>
		<description>I left out KFC! 

I liked how they made the vector sharper. It looks clean and crispier but I am not sure about too much tan in the logo. I like how they incorporated the famous bucket shape instead of square. It is much more dynamic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I left out KFC! </p>
<p>I liked how they made the vector sharper. It looks clean and crispier but I am not sure about too much tan in the logo. I like how they incorporated the famous bucket shape instead of square. It is much more dynamic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @elibbagate</title>
		<link>http://theroxor.com/2009/03/26/old-vs-new-great-logo-redesigns/comment-page-1/#comment-13366</link>
		<dc:creator>@elibbagate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theroxor.com/?p=1215#comment-13366</guid>
		<description>have to disagree with you on Compaq and Holiday Inn, it looks like a logo for some feminine product (I can just see the little H going &quot;yay freedom from...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have to disagree with you on Compaq and Holiday Inn, it looks like a logo for some feminine product (I can just see the little H going &#8220;yay freedom from&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://theroxor.com/2009/03/26/old-vs-new-great-logo-redesigns/comment-page-1/#comment-13365</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theroxor.com/?p=1215#comment-13365</guid>
		<description>Most of the logo that are being redesigned on here are great and some are really poor executed with the idea in the beginning. 

Apple - Glossy and sophisticated just like their products. Smart move on Apple. (and everyone knows that Apple will never throw away the bitten apple logo, anyways).

Best Buy - I liked it how they simplified it. It was smart of them to keep the yellow tag. 

BP - BP has done some &quot;green&quot; changes and &quot;green&quot; products within their own branding. It makes sense. It is also more dynamic and abstract. 

Cnet - Subtle change and much better without the divider. It was too distracting. 

Delta - A good subtle change. Ordinary and glossier.

Discovery - A huge improvement and kept it simply clean. They also have different stuff in the &quot;D&quot; gap on the tv, too. I once saw they did a sun in between the &quot;D&quot; It makes it fun. 

Holiday Inn - Finally updated and I am glad they kept one distinctive cursive, especially with the &quot;y&quot;. It was too much before and it looked dated. I am sure this will be dated quickly, anyways.

Intel - Updated well done and didn&#039;t butcher the logo identity. 

Lancia - Sharper and modern. 

Memorex - Simple and easy to read. The cd design within the old &quot;M&quot; was transferred to the &quot;O&quot; in the new logo. I think this is ordinary logo. Could have done something more exciting. 

Palm - Updated well done. Didn&#039;t butcher up the logo identity. 

San Disk - Very subtle change: They borrowed the square from the old logo into the new logo&#039;s dotted &quot;I&quot;. 

The Science Channel - Brilliant logo. 

Walmart - I hated it at first and then it grew on me. I like the lowercase font and the color. It was nice departure from the CAPS with sterile blue color. They have already marketed around the yellow burst. It is still a strange choice, though. 



Now for the logo redesign that didn&#039;t fare well: 

Air France - I do not like how they mushed it up together. The distinctive mark is gone and the new typography is better but it&#039;s still a tragedy. 

Compaq - Extremely ugly font. The distinctive &quot;q&quot; is gone. I remember Compaq by the distinctive &quot;q&quot;. They could have marketed around that idea or modernize the logo. It&#039;s a shame.

Sprint - When it came out with that new logo. Only thing I liked was the font. I hate the mark. It is too distracting. Too similar to Amtrak, Astroturf and Taca.

Taca - Too similar to Astroturf, Sprint and Amtrak. 

Astroturf - I only like the font and it is definitely a big improvement from the old one but the mark is terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the logo that are being redesigned on here are great and some are really poor executed with the idea in the beginning. </p>
<p>Apple &#8211; Glossy and sophisticated just like their products. Smart move on Apple. (and everyone knows that Apple will never throw away the bitten apple logo, anyways).</p>
<p>Best Buy &#8211; I liked it how they simplified it. It was smart of them to keep the yellow tag. </p>
<p>BP &#8211; BP has done some &#8220;green&#8221; changes and &#8220;green&#8221; products within their own branding. It makes sense. It is also more dynamic and abstract. </p>
<p>Cnet &#8211; Subtle change and much better without the divider. It was too distracting. </p>
<p>Delta &#8211; A good subtle change. Ordinary and glossier.</p>
<p>Discovery &#8211; A huge improvement and kept it simply clean. They also have different stuff in the &#8220;D&#8221; gap on the tv, too. I once saw they did a sun in between the &#8220;D&#8221; It makes it fun. </p>
<p>Holiday Inn &#8211; Finally updated and I am glad they kept one distinctive cursive, especially with the &#8220;y&#8221;. It was too much before and it looked dated. I am sure this will be dated quickly, anyways.</p>
<p>Intel &#8211; Updated well done and didn&#8217;t butcher the logo identity. </p>
<p>Lancia &#8211; Sharper and modern. </p>
<p>Memorex &#8211; Simple and easy to read. The cd design within the old &#8220;M&#8221; was transferred to the &#8220;O&#8221; in the new logo. I think this is ordinary logo. Could have done something more exciting. </p>
<p>Palm &#8211; Updated well done. Didn&#8217;t butcher up the logo identity. </p>
<p>San Disk &#8211; Very subtle change: They borrowed the square from the old logo into the new logo&#8217;s dotted &#8220;I&#8221;. </p>
<p>The Science Channel &#8211; Brilliant logo. </p>
<p>Walmart &#8211; I hated it at first and then it grew on me. I like the lowercase font and the color. It was nice departure from the CAPS with sterile blue color. They have already marketed around the yellow burst. It is still a strange choice, though. </p>
<p>Now for the logo redesign that didn&#8217;t fare well: </p>
<p>Air France &#8211; I do not like how they mushed it up together. The distinctive mark is gone and the new typography is better but it&#8217;s still a tragedy. </p>
<p>Compaq &#8211; Extremely ugly font. The distinctive &#8220;q&#8221; is gone. I remember Compaq by the distinctive &#8220;q&#8221;. They could have marketed around that idea or modernize the logo. It&#8217;s a shame.</p>
<p>Sprint &#8211; When it came out with that new logo. Only thing I liked was the font. I hate the mark. It is too distracting. Too similar to Amtrak, Astroturf and Taca.</p>
<p>Taca &#8211; Too similar to Astroturf, Sprint and Amtrak. </p>
<p>Astroturf &#8211; I only like the font and it is definitely a big improvement from the old one but the mark is terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Not So Great Logo Redesigns &#124; The Roxor &#124; Design blog for resources and inspiration</title>
		<link>http://theroxor.com/2009/03/26/old-vs-new-great-logo-redesigns/comment-page-1/#comment-13343</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Not So Great Logo Redesigns &#124; The Roxor &#124; Design blog for resources and inspiration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theroxor.com/?p=1215#comment-13343</guid>
		<description>[...] Not So Great Logo Redesigns Posted by Kvn on August 25th, 2009  We already took a collection of beautiful new logo&#8217;s. Today we take a look at the other side; some not so great logo redesigns. Some of these designs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not So Great Logo Redesigns Posted by Kvn on August 25th, 2009  We already took a collection of beautiful new logo&#8217;s. Today we take a look at the other side; some not so great logo redesigns. Some of these designs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yael K. Miller</title>
		<link>http://theroxor.com/2009/03/26/old-vs-new-great-logo-redesigns/comment-page-1/#comment-2538</link>
		<dc:creator>Yael K. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theroxor.com/?p=1215#comment-2538</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, I have to disagree with you on some of the logo redesigns being better than the old ones.

Best Buy:  Did they really change it?  The yellow tag is instantly recognizable -- the new one is like a thousand other logos.

Delta: I liked the serif font and the blue-red of the icon in the old one.  The all red icon and the stiff all-caps sans font are too forceful -- is this an airline or a military camp?

Holiday Inn: Gets a big &quot;what were they thinking?&quot;  It looks like an app icon rather than a chain of hotels.

KFC: The new Colonel is scary -- too vector-y -- for a company that&#039;s pushed family and welcoming for as long as I can remember.

Palm: Not a big fan of the new font but it&#039;s not bad like the above ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, I have to disagree with you on some of the logo redesigns being better than the old ones.</p>
<p>Best Buy:  Did they really change it?  The yellow tag is instantly recognizable &#8212; the new one is like a thousand other logos.</p>
<p>Delta: I liked the serif font and the blue-red of the icon in the old one.  The all red icon and the stiff all-caps sans font are too forceful &#8212; is this an airline or a military camp?</p>
<p>Holiday Inn: Gets a big &#8220;what were they thinking?&#8221;  It looks like an app icon rather than a chain of hotels.</p>
<p>KFC: The new Colonel is scary &#8212; too vector-y &#8212; for a company that&#8217;s pushed family and welcoming for as long as I can remember.</p>
<p>Palm: Not a big fan of the new font but it&#8217;s not bad like the above ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
